| Geoscience and Environment |
| The camera rig is suspended from the kite line using a Picavet, named after its inventor. Most Picavet systems now are modified versions of the original. The version I used is very close to that described by Brooks Leffler in The Aerial Eye 1:4. Essentially, the movement of the lines through the pulleys is restricted by a cord-lock (brooxes horizon helper™). The vibration damper was described by Craig wilson in The Aerial Eye 1:4. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Some additional gear is needed for safe-handling the equipment. The first photo (below) shows a spar with a ring, a cleat and eyebolt with thick nylon line. (Click the image for details.) The second image (below) is from a work-in-progress, construction of a winder inspired by a reel called Strato-Spool, which used to be sold by Into The Wind, a supplier of kites and equipment (http://www.intothewind.com/).(Click the image for details.) See the images of equipment provided by James and Susam Aber. Image of the Strato-Spool. (Great Plains Aerial Photography (equipment page). Thumbnail is about 3/4 down the page.). The third image (below) gives some construction details. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
DiscussionThis was the author's second attempt at kite flying. (The first was a few days earlier.) Most of the photos were spoiled by improper aiming of the camera caused by inept use of the radio controls or by camera movement. Practice is needed to improve kite and camera handling skills. Unfortunately, in northwest Peninsular Malaysia there are not many windy days at this time of the year.All photos shown are from third roll of 36-exposure film, since the first 72 exposures contained nothing of interest. Three factors seem to affect the quality of the photos. First, the film and shutter speed must be fast enough to cope with light conditions. The Olympus MJU-I that I am using has a range up to 1/500 second and /16. The first roll I shot was on ISO 200 film. This means that with a cloudless sky the shutter speed would be 1/250. The blurring visible in the photos caused me to switch to ISO 400 film, which would give 1/500 with a cloudless sky, probably sufficient to give sharp photos. However, I thought the blurring might have been increased by vibration of the line. So I used rubber rings to cut down vibration, as proposed by Craig Wilson (The Aerial Eye 1:4). My next experiment will be to use Fuji's Superia X-TRA ISO 800 film when the sky is a little cloudy. A better solution would be to switch to the MJU-II and ISO 800 film, to get 1/1000 second on a bright cloudless day. |
Return to Aerial Photography Menu |
| The URL of this site is [http://www.geoscience-environment.com] |